• 1
    titolo della caption
  • 2
    titolo della caption
  • 3
    titolo della caption
  • 4
    titolo della caption
  • 5
    titolo della caption
Problem B - governance doesn't seem to be adding much value

A session with the governing body using the maturity matrix would be a useful first move to establish a common agreement in the CCG leadership around the areas where the hoped for outcomes of good governance are not being achieved.

This could usefully be followed by a peer review exercise with another CCG to explore key points where improvements could be made. If the peer review could be organised to focus on areas of both strength and weakness, this would enable a productive two-way learning process with the peer reviewing CCG.

As a supplement or an alternative to the peer review, the observation tool could be useful to surface some of the issues with decision-taking by targeting both the governing body meetings and some of the supporting committee discussions.

RECOMMENDED TOOLS

PEER REVIEW

MATURITY MATRIX

OBSERVATION

THE TOOLS

2
MATURITY MATRIX
4
STANDARDS AND EVIDENCE
5
OBSERVATION
3
PEER PREVIEW
1
SURVEY

Copyright 2015 - GGI - NHS England - All right reserved - AP design

GGI Limited Registered office: Old Horsmans, New Road, Sedlescombe, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 0RL. Company number: 06836117. Registered in England and Wales.